Subscribe to this blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Excellent New Essay by Steve Best

Check it out. For whatever it’s worth, I agree completely with his assertions, including the one in which he notes that homo sapiens sapiens never HAS been a nice kind of species, regardless of what anyone might like to imagine in our more wistful moments. The reality is that we’ve been conquering, dominating creatures since we assumed this form.

Where I think I differ from Best is in the belief that we ever CAN be anything other than what we’ve been. Hence (in my mind, anyway), one reason why our new name is so apt: Veganism is the Next Evolution. Evolution as in literal, biological, species-level. Homo sapiens sapiens have to go — we’ve proven incapable of being anything more than a virus on this planet. After all, as Best notes, we wiped out the Neanderthals, humanoids who possessed not only culture and language, but also the ability to live WITH everyone else as opposed to separate from (and crushing) everyone else. The perfect humans, and we wiped them out.

Thus, we must evolve or die — and take everyone else with us. Time will tell which we choose. In the meantime, we keep fighting.

I’ll write again soon — been busy with our second push to get projects done here at the sanctuary before winter — but in the meantime, I wanted to do my part to spread this essay around.

For the animals,

Miriam Jones


Our Task
by Steve Best, PhD.

August 4, 2011

The “animal rights movement,” such as it is, poses a fundamental evolutionary challenge to human beings in the midst of severe social and ecological crises. Can we recognize that the animal question is central to the human question? Can we grasp how the exploitation of nonhuman animals is implicated in every aspect of mental, social, and ecological breakdown? Can we illuminate and eliminate the corrupt constellation of overlapping oppressions that constitute the sickness and bungled experiment we call “civilization”? Can we become truly enlightened and overcome one of the last remaining prejudices, a sanctioned system of murder, a legally-validated police-protected form of enslavement, an ongoing holocaust? Can humans reorganize their economic institutions, retool their technologies, and reconstruct their cultural traditions apart from visceral violence and socially-secured sadism? Can they construct new sensibilities, values, worldviews, and identities?

Animal liberation is an assault on human identity alienated from the natural world and complex with vanity and arrogance.   It demands that humans relinquish their sense of superiority over nonhumans and smash the compasses of anthropocentrism and speciesism. Animal liberation provokes people to realize that power demands responsibility and that might is not right.  It places an unprecedented burden on humanity to act altruistically and no longer exploit their fellow beings.  Animal liberation calls people back to an integral consciousness and relation to their teeming natural surroundings such as their early ancestors enjoyed before symbolic thinking, technological culture, agriculture, and the emergence of hierarchical ideologies and institutions.

By expanding the definition and boundaries of moral subjects and community, animal liberationists challenge hierarchical thinking of all kinds (racism, sexism, heterosexism, classism, ablism, and statism). Above all, it dismisses the speciesist mindset that humanity is apart from , rather than a part of , the natural world and evolutionary processes.  In a masterful example of question begging and circular reasoning – animals are deemed inferior to humans because they are not humans (i.e., they lack allegedly unique human qualities such as reasoning, language, and symbolic and technological cultures). Distorted conceptions of human beings as demigods who command a planet that exists solely for their interests and benefits must be replaced with the far more humble and holistic notion that humans belong to, and are dependent upon, vast networks of organic and inorganic relationships.

Let’s be clear: we are fighting for a revolution, not for reforms; for the end of slavery, not for “humane” slavemasters; for a new consciousness, not welfare, “benevolent slavery,” or “enlightened humanism.” Animal liberation advances the most radical idea to ever land on human ears: animals are not ours to exploit as food, clothing, resources, commodities, data, or “entertainment.” They exist for their own purposes, not ours. But animal liberation is simply unthinkable on its own terms, rather than as part and parcel of a larger revolutionary project that integrates human, animal, and Earth liberation as one inseparable struggle.

Thus, we must not only educate and agitate, we must form a social movement that combines the merely partial struggles for social justice, autonomy, animal rights, and ecology in a global, revolutionary politics of total liberation. As with all revolutions, animals will not gain “rights” (or whatever a possible future society calls inviolable and inalienable moral and legal protections against abuse and exploitation) because oppressors suddenly see the light, but rather because enough people become enraged, engaged, and learn how to rock the structures of power, to shake them until new social arrangements emerge.

Animal liberation requires that people transcend the complacent boundaries of humanism – however “radical” and “progressive” – to effect a qualitative leap in ethical consideration, one that moves the moral bar from reason and language to sentience and subjectivity . Humans must not only change their views toward one another, a massive undertaking in itself, they must  also recognize that the species boundaries separating human from nonhuman animals are as arbitrary as those of race and sex. Animal liberation is possible only as total liberation that is advanced as part and parcel of a radical social movement and realizes moral learning processes in the institutional networks of a truly democratic post-capitalist society.

Animal liberation expands on classic humanist values such as rights, democracy, equality, justice, and peace, as it broadens inclusivity, expands moral value and legal protection, and deepens community. In taking the quantum jump beyond humanism, animal liberation does not “trivialize” human rights (as bioethicist Arthur Kaplan claims), but rather  frees the universal and progressive aspects of rights from the ignorance, bias, prejudice, and discrimination of  “rational” and “enlightened” human beings. Humanism is nothing but a generalized tribalism, applying to the artificially-created chasm between “Us” and “Them,” between human and nonhuman animals, a conceptual dualism that underpins the vicious and violent system of species apartheid .

As difficult, bloody, and tenacious the battle to win gains in human rights and equality has been throughout modern Western history, we must recognize that every justice struggle to the present has been relatively easy. Now it gets hard.

The patterns of history cannot be changed by the vain hopes of pacifists who believe that Divine intervention, moral magic, chanting and vigils, leafleting and online petitions, and vegan potlucks will make animal liberation – which threatens human psychological, social, and economic structures in profound ways – will be achieved peacefully, without shedding a drop of blood, through reason, compassion, and persuasion. Far more plausibly, especially as social and ecological crises heat up to fever pitch, we are headed for a profound, lengthy, and violent war – a war of human against nonhuman animals, of liberationists against exploiters, and of the corporate-state complex against militants and dissenters of any kind.

The struggle to end human supremacy is the most difficult liberation battle of all because speciesism is virtually primordial and universal. Speciesism was arguably the first form of hierarchical domination and a key model and blueprint for slavery, racism, sexism, heterosexism, ablism, and fascism. Speciesist cultures have grown in scale and degree throughout human history and its poisonous roots of human supremacism have spread throughout the globe.

Power, domination, violence, and extermination are not dynamics limited to Western culture or the modern world, as if there were a utopian past or radical alternative to recover. While wary of biological reductionism, it is nevertheless evident that power pathologies are deeply embedded in the long social and biological history of humans, and our ancient Australopithecine and primate ancestors. As  the appalled “monster” in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein (1818) learns upon reading a book, the history of humanity is a tale of violence, warfare, genocide, and destruction, such that a war of extermination was first unleashed, quite likely, on a fellow human species, Homo neanderthalensis . Then, after a 15,000 year long pogrom designed to eliminate Neanderthals, humans hunted large mammals (megafauna) into extinction on every continent they roamed.

Beginning ten thousand years ago, humans from hierarchical agricultural societies slaughtered remaining hunting and gathering tribes, waged wider warfare against one another, enslaved captive populations, and from Romans and Mayans to Christians and the “manifest destiny” of the US, humans blanketed the Earth with invading armies whose numbers rose from thousands to millions to billions, exceeding ecological limits the entire way and paying the price with every crash and collapse.

Fueled by greed, bloodlust, cruelty, orgies of killing, and insatiable appetites for power, the Roman, Greek, Mayan empires are but variations on the global Human Empire – the tyrannical reign of Homo rapiens – such that one species on a path of runaway growth and expansion has colonized a fecund planet capable of generating tens of millions of species.

The pathologies of power and are not limited to Western societies or to the modern world, such that there is some significant utopian past or cultural alternative to recover. While social institutions such as capitalism magnify the worst aspects of human behavior, a violent dominator complex is not wholly accidental to the human species itself, which, but for rare exceptions, is a violent, destructive, and imperialist animal. Human beings have proven incapable of learning from past disasters, and unable to relinquish their arrogance and delusions.

Animal liberation is the most difficult battle we have ever fought because it requires widespread agreement to abandon the privileges of power and what people widely perceive to be their hard-won or God-given rights to exploit nonhuman animals and the entire Earth for their purposes.

To change these attitudes, and the systems they inform, is to change the very nerve center of human consciousness and existence .

That is our task no more and no less.

8 comments to Excellent New Essay by Steve Best

  • Have you heard PETA is opening a porn website? Pictures of animal cruelty with porn — the erotization of animal abuse.

  • bravebird
    While I can’t say I’m thrilled with many of PETA’s campaigns, I have to say that this one might actually be one I agree with. IF they are showing that the exploitation of women is analogous to animal cruelty — if they are showing images of both in conjunction with one another to make people see the connections — then I would say excellent job. To me that would not be a porn site — it would be an educational site similar to the ones they started to show the connections between animal use/abuse and slavery, as well as animal abuse/use and the Holocaust. (Not that PETA was the first organization to make these connections, mind you.)

    If, on the other hand, they are using porn in some VERY misguided way that they think will make people realize animal cruelty is sickening, just like they think naked women will induce people to realize wearing fur is horrific, then I would say it’s the same old sexism from PETA.

    The problem is, I’ve searched and can’t find this actual site — only comments about it — and those comments make me wonder what, exactly, is going on, and if folks have misunderstood the intentions of the campaign. Anyone have a direct link to this “porn site?”

  • bravebird
    Ah — yeah, more of the same old, same old. Too bad — I can envision an EXCELLENT, similar, campaign, with battery cages full of women with ripped-out hair, lesions all over their bodies, mangled lips, skinny to the point of emaciation, ideally computer-generated, of course, all fighting each other for another inch of space….. Baby boys in veal crates, plump and unable to move….. Etc Etc Etc… Instead this looks like another vanilla version of some SM club with dancers in cages. Boring, stupid, and useless. Too bad, because again, a brilliant campaign COULD have been created. I guess I’ll go back to ignoring PETA.
  • The thing about what you envision as a good consciousness raising porn campaign is that today men would masturbate to images of women treated that way. There is a lot of porn like that right now available commercially and men (and women) love it. They are adult survivors of abusive childhoods with love means punishment sexuality, and mysoginists. PETA’s porn site is going to further eroticise animal abuse. I believe the corporate agri business people are funding it to normalice their treatment of animals. The Weiner Syndrome. It’s so normal we can now do it publicly without fear.
  • Today is the day women celebrate the gaining of the right to vote, Aug 26th 1920. I believe your work is part of the continuing effort toward evolution. So happy women’s rights day to you. If you can get a copy of the DVD “Iron Jawed Angels” do so and have a little party. Or go here and watch it segment by segment. It will refresh you.

    After the preview you watch 1/2 then 1 1/2 then 2 etc. Enjoy!

  • normalize not normalice – i hate it when i do that
  • bravebird
    Hey, Greenconsciousness — sorry no reply for a bit!

    Yes, you are right that folks might well get turned on by such images — I still think it’s worthwhile, just like I think Sue Coe’s work in which she shows a naked woman with the “cuts” of meat outlined on her body, is worthwhile also. But clearly that is NOT what PETA is doing, whatsoever.

    And I take back my comment about ignoring them — I’ve done that for a long time, and while I feel tired about addressing their “naked women fur” crap campaigns (and besides, plenty of other people are doing that already), I DO feel that more folks need to address their other anti-animal campaigns including lauding KFC for using certain kinds of chickens and not others, lauding McDonald’s for using this kind of egg instead of another kind, that sort of bullshit “activism” that means nothing other than patting corporate assholes on the back and validating the use of animals if it’s done in certain ways and not others.

    To be clear, I find their anti-feminist stuff horrible, but I feel more compelled to comment upon how they hurt non-human animals with their misguided campaigns than to comment upon how they hurt human animals with their misguided campaigns.

    That’s just me anyway. :-)

    Thanks for the reminder of the anniversary of women “winning” the vote in this country!

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>