Subscribe!

 Subscribe to this blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

home

Intersectionality and Animals

Here’s the video of my recent lecture, “Intersectionality in Theory and Practice” at the International Animal Rights Conference in Luxembourg last month. For those who don’t have the time or patience to watch a 90 minute lecture, I’ve recapped many of the key points below. You might also want to visit the “Intersections” section of our website, which is about to be revamped and expanded but already has some thought provoking ideas, and links to further readings, on the links between speciesism and racism, sexism, homophobia, and ecocide.

Animals live, suffer, and die in circumstances shaped by human activities. Those human activities are always entangled in social, historical, economic, and cultural processes that are patterned not only by speciesism but also by factors like racism and sexism.

Legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term “intersectionality” as a way of understanding and speaking about the complex and compounding interactions between different forms of oppression. In the same way that surveyors need trigonometry and engineers need calculus, activists need intersectionality as a conceptual tool. Without this tool, it is impossible to accurately assess the problem to be solved and difficult to design effective strategies.

The interactions among race, sex, and class oppression were the initial focus of intersectional investigation. We have since come to understand how these interact with other factors, such as disability or nationality. More recently, we’ve slowly come to see how these intersecting biases both enable and are compounded by human pollution and exploitation of the enviroment. And now we face the urgent task of including nonhuman animals in our intersectional analyses.

Social and environmental justice activists must come to understand how speciesism is foundational to intra-species oppression, setting the terms of and helping to maintain the many ways that people exploit each other and the earth. At the same time, animal advocates must come to understand that every act of abuse or injustice against animals occurs within social and material circumstances that cannot be adequately addressed without an understanding of intersectionality.

Extended to include speciesism and exploitation of animals among the oppressive ideologies and practices it surveys, intersectionality offers both animal and social/environmental justice activists a deeper and more complete understanding of the systems in which the problems on which they work (and they themselves) are enmeshed and, therefore, increases the likelihood of conceiving and implementing truly effective strategies. As a bonus, this extended understanding of intersectionality opens up avenues for cooperation and collaboration across movements.

Essential Insights

Crenshaw chose the word “intersection” aptly. When you are standing at the center of the intersection of Main Street and First Avenue, it is not possible to say which of those two roads you are on—you are on both of them at the same time. Thinking about job discrimination against women of color, Crenshaw saw that it often was not possible to say whether the discrimination was due to either racial bias or gender bias—it was both at once, in alloys not predictable by simple admixture.

The interactions between racism and sexism turn out to be multiplicative rather than additive. The functions of those interactions cannot be disaggregated. Racial stereotypes are gendered. Violence against women is enabled by racism.

Sexism, racism, and other forms of bias among people not only share sources and characteristics, they also interact in a mutually-reinforcing manner. This can most easily be seen in Suzanne Pharr’s insight that homophobia is “a weapon of sexism.” While it certainly is true that some bias against LGBTQ folks comes down to prejudice rooted in ignorance, the structural function of homophobia (and transphobia too) is to maintain the man-on-top gender system. You don’t have to actually be gay to be gay bashed. You don’t have to identify as trans to be subject to transphobia. All that you have to do to be vulnerable to these forms of bias is transgress gender roles. That means that LGBTQ liberation is a necessary project of feminism and that LGBTQ liberation cannot be truly realized until we have solved sexism.

Ecofeminist scholars such as Lori Gruen and Marti Kheel have shown that a “logic of domination” structures Eurocentric thinking about not only race and gender but also earth and animals. This logic artificially (and falsely!) divides the world into opposed dualisms —male vs female, human vs animal, culture vs nature, reason vs emotion, etc.— according superiority to one of each pair. The terms on each side of the hierarchical divide are linked: Men are seen as more rational, women and people of color are seen as closer to nature, classes of people are put down by calling them animal names.

If you want to dismantle a structure, the thing to do is knock out the joints. So, activists who want to make the most impact will look for ways to work at the intersections, ideally doing so in ways that make tangible progress on a specific problem while at the same time helping to undermine the structure of the intersecting system of oppressions.

If it is not possible to find such an intersection at which to work, it is still necessary to keep intersectionality in mind when selecting tactics and rhetoric, so as to avoid unintentionally undermining your own goals by inadvertently participating in the subordination of somebody else.

Preparing to Work Intersectionally

Every new tool requires some practice to use. This is particularly true for intersectionality, which requires us to see patterns, recognize relationships, and analyze complex interactions among multiple variables. Those of us who were schooled in the U.S. or Europe have been trained to think in exactly the opposite direction and thus may need to make an affirmative effort to learn to think in terms of commonalities rather than distinctions, context rather than abstraction, and systems rather than individuals.

Here are some simple exercises you can do:

  • Think of two forms of oppression, such as sexism and speciesism, and challenge yourself to come up with ways that they intersect.
  • Think of a problem, such as prisons or zoos, and challenge yourself to identify how many different forms of oppression intersect in it.
  • Think of a tactic of oppression, such as stereotyping or forced labor, and challenge yourself to identify the ways that this is deployed in different forms of oppression.
  • Think of a goal of oppression, such as profiteering or control of reproduction, and challenge yourself to see how this is sought by means of different forms of oppression.
  • Think of an impact of one form of oppression, such as the emotional callousness necessary for meat-eating, and challenge yourself to identify the ways that this reverberates so as to support other forms of oppression.

Please note that you may need to educate yourself while doing these exercises. You can’t expect yourself to see the links between speciesism and racism, for example, if you don’t know anything about racism! Just as you learned about speciesism and the many forms of animal exploitation it has engendered, you may need to actively educate yourself about other forms of oppression. Here’s a tip: You can do so by reading or watching documentaries about the movements against those forms of oppression. That way, you will be getting an education in activist tactics as well!

Preliminary Findings

Activists have just begun to sketch the intersections among speciesism and other forms of oppression. Already, our findings are exciting and potentially very useful. Here are just a few examples of what we learn when using the exercises above to think about the relationships among exploitation of animals and social/environmental injustice:

  • The “big three” excuses for animal exploitation —might makes right, we have abilities they don’t have, and God said so— all also are used to explain away (or not bother to explain) social injustice. These ways of thinking lead to war, discrimination, and other ills.
  • Sexism and speciesism have been so entangled for so long —dating back to the days when daughters and dairy cows both were the property of male heads of households— that neither can be fully understood without reference to the other.
  • What has been called “reprocentrism” is not only foundational to animal exploitation but also central to patriarchy and capitalism. Incessant reproduction (of people, animals, and products) has brought us to the brink of planetary disaster.
  • The psychological maneuver by which people lifted themselves up and out of ecosystems in order to turn both land and animals into property to be bought and sold not only underpins speciesism and environmental despoliation but also tends to lead to the individualism and alienation that are key factors in capitalism and other ailments.
  • Speciesism seems so natural that species privilege is even more invisible than white privilege or male privilege. The invisibility of privilege, then, is a matter of joint concern for several movements.
  • Slaughterhouse workers, vivisectors, and even everyday meat-eaters tend to be forthright in saying that they “just don’t think about” the suffering they cause. This mental habit of not-thinking-about-suffering also facilitates social injustice, as when U.S. consumers just don’t think about the suffering of underpaid or even enslaved workers.

Here are just a few ways that particular forms of animal exploitation intersect with social and environmental injustice:

  • Dairy production requires the forced impregnation of cows, from whom the calves are taken shortly after birth. This physical and emotional violation of female animals for profit creates products which the powerful and highly subsidized dairy industry place in every public school, despite the fact that the majority of children of color are lactose intolerant.
  • Zoos began as expressions of empire in which both people and animals were exhibited. Zoos continue to express the ultimate human hubris by insisting that we can manufacture ecosystems —an African savannah in Philadelphia! an arctic ocean in Florida!— and “save” endangered animals not by returning their habitats to them but by controlling their reproduction.
  • Circuses and other uses of animals in entertainment also are spectacles of human control of nature. Many of these, such as cockfighting and rodeos, also represent spectacles of socially constructed masculinity.
  • Hands-on exploitation of animals tends to promote not only emotional callousness but also contempt for weakness. Thus we see high rates of violence against partners and children in communities where factory farms and slaughterhouses tend to be located. Environmental injustice leads these highly polluting installations to be located in low-income regions and communities of color.

Intersectional Activism in Practice

Here are some examples of animal liberation activism at the intersections:

At VINE Sanctuary we have used our ground-breaking work rehabilitating fighting roosters to illuminate and challenge the use of animals in the social construction of gender. We’ve also used our standpoint as an LGBTQ-run organization to promote the “queering” of animal liberation.

The Food Empowerment Project promotes access to fresh produce and dairy alternatives in communities of color.

The Sistah Vegan Project promotes veganism as an anticolonial, antiracist, and feminist practice.

The Healthy School Lunches project works to counteract the dietary racism implicit in the inclusion of cow’s milk in all free and subsidized lunches even though the majority of children of color are lactose intolerant.

In Poland, ecofeminist animal rights organizers affiliated with Otwarte Klatki shared skills and resources with residents of more than 20 rural villages, thereby empowering them to mount their own successful campaigns against industrial fur farms.

In Brazil, the animal rights organization VEDDAS has allied with indigenous people to challenge a proposed dam.

Here are just a few examples of work that could be done at intersections of speciesism and other forms of injustice:

  • Food justice and vegan organizations could work collaboratively to increase access to both fresh produce and dairy alternatives in low-income communities.
  • Feminist and animal rights activists could work together to ensure that every domestic violence shelter is linked to a humane society or animal rescue organization willing to foster the companion animals who are often abused themselves and frequently the reason battered women do not seek shelter.
  • Disability rights and anti-vivisection activists could work together to challenge the for-profit animal testing industry that exploits animals while failing to establish the safety or efficacy of drugs.
  • ___ <== Your idea here! Imagine it. Try it. Tell us how it goes!

12 comments to Intersectionality and Animals

  • Patricia Massari
    Thank you so much for this comprehensive and brilliant piece of work…will be sharing it in part and in full again and again…
  • Thank you for this piece that I will make use of in my work.

    As part of last year’s celebration of Creative Maladjustment https://www.facebook.com/pages/Association-for-Creative-Maladjustment-to-Animal-Rights-Violations/396182187163021 I gave a lecture on compassion at the intersection of human rights in the area of mental health(specifically referring to the violation of rights experienced by humans in psychiatric treatment that is the work of Mind Freedom International) and animal rights. My lecture focussed on the science of compassion and how self-care is an ethical obligation for all activists as well as a more progressive form of help for people suffering from psychological distress than forced pharmacological and electro-shock interventions. I believe that our human psychological health is severely impacted by the crimes we commit towards other animals and towards our shared environment. Most of the professional services that people suffering from psychological distress are offered emanate from science (much of it pseudo-science at that) that is based on horrific psychological and pharmacological studies on non-human animals such as the ongoing Maternal Deprivation Studies at the University of Wisconsin Madison. The value of this lecture lay in illuminating for this varied group of activists some common themes such as the shared abuse of power, loss of liberty, violation of rights and unnecessary suffering simply because one experiences psychological pain or is born a member of a species that is not human. The same science of compassion that prevents human suffering can prevent non-human suffering.
    http://www.edenfarmanimalsanctuary.com
    http://www.matildaspromise.org
    http://www.thecompassionfoundation.org

  • pattrice
    Thanks for this comment and those links. If you’ve not done so, you may want to have a look at my book, Aftershock, which is a self-care handbook for activists published in 2007 by Lantern Books that addresses many of the points you raise here.
  • Actually yes, I used a lot of material from Aftershock in that lecture. Reading the book was a very helpful affirmation to me of many of the self care strategies that I recommend for activists and that I practice myself. It was very helpful to me to read about your own challenges and coping skills in running a sanctuary. In addition, I discovered elements of ecopsychology in Aftershock that I was already using in my clinical practice that I found very heartening. I am especially interested in the necessity of embracing our own animal nature and realising the truth of our place on this planet which is not at the top of a hierarchy – a myth that has placed immense stress on humans as they compete with each other as well as perpetuating the idea that it is acceptable to exploit and torture on other animals. Thank you Patrice.
  • […] of meeting pattrice jones, author of Aftershock and founding member of Vine Sanctuary. Her words on intersectionality offer insights into this imagination. (Links in text are my additions by way of offering resources […]
  • Lucy R Kaplan
    “If you want to dismantle a structure, the thing to do is knock out the joints.” In this breathtakingly concise and vivid byword, pattrice awakens me to the only hope we really have for undoing the effects of the ubiquitous force of oppression that works through so many different constructs today. Now I thirst to learn where the human impulse to oppress (via those false dualisms identified by ecofeminists Gruen and Kheel)comes from. Is it possible that in addition to knocking out the intersecting joints, we may be able to launch a frontal attack against the underlying oppression impulse itself, once its origins are exposed?
  • […] Genehmigung von pattrice jones. Eine alternative Version des Originaltextes befindet sich auf: http://blog.bravebirds.org/archives/1553 […]
  • […] Intersect encourages radical intersectional analyses of oppression that are sorely needed both in activist circles and in general public […]
  • […] be December 2 at 7pm at Next Chapter Books in Barre.The book is a brilliant piece that examines the intersections of oppressions as well as social psychology. We hope you can make […]
  • […] “radical intersectional analyses of oppression that are sorely needed both in activist circles and in general public […]
  • […] to refuse to herald Michelle’s triumph and these are wrapped up in two connected concepts – intersectionality and total […]
  • […] to draw upon the wisdom of pattrice jones – who calls upon us all to work at seeing patterns, commonalities, relationships and systems […]

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>