Subscribe!

 Subscribe to this blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

home

What You Can Do to End the Conspiracy Against Vegan Mayo

Last week, vegan mayo broke into the news, thanks to a FOIA request that proved that a taxpayer-funded agency has been colluding with the egg industry to try to crush a new and popular sandwich spread made right here in the USA. That’s right: The U.S. government is trying to crush a U.S. business… because that business represents a threat to the interests of a well-funded animal agriculture lobby.

Color us completely unsurprised. As we have said again and again and again (and again) over the years, the success  of the animal liberation movement will depend on our ability to pursue a multi-faceted strategy that takes into account the social and economic systems within which animal exploitation is entirely entangled.

The case of Just Mayo proves that point: Thanks to the efforts of people promoting personal veganism, there’s now a sufficient market for egg-free products to entice investors into funding an exciting start-up. The start-up produces products that vegans do, in fact, buy and also begins to make in-roads into the diets of non-vegans (e.g., via the decision of 7-Eleven to begin using the egg-free product in its sandwiches). But that’s not enough. Because, at the same time, the USDA-funded American Egg Board is colluding with egg producers to try to shut down the start-up — including by convincing yet another government agency to investigate it!

Luckily, not all animal advocates have bought into the spurious idea that the only form of effective animal activism is promoting personal veganism. And so, working behind the scenes, an activist used FOIA requests to expose this conspiracy.

You can do something about it too. Here’s a petition demanding an investigation into the USDA’s actions in this case. If the petition gets enough signatures from people in the U.S., then President Obama will read and respond to it.

We usually do not promote online petitions, but we do encourage you to sign this one. Let us explain. An effective online petition (a) will be delivered to the entity to whom it is directed;  (b) asks that entity to do something specific that is within its power to do; and (c) is signed by people whose views matter to the recipient.

Most online petitions fail one or all of those tests. The vast majority of online “petitions” (we’re looking at you, change.org) exist for the sole purpose of harvesting email addresses of the signers, so that nonprofits can send them donation appeals. Many of these petitions either are not addressed and delivered to a particular decision-maker or are signed by people who the decision-maker doesn’t care about.

For example, one of the earliest and most popular online petitions was addressed to the Taliban and demanded that they stop oppressing girls and women. The petition was signed by thousands and thousands of women. Obviously, the men of the Taliban –even if they had seen the signatures on the petition– did not care at all that thousands of women in other countries thought that they shouldn’t oppress the women in their country! Sometimes leaders of a particular region DO care what people in other places think (especially if their economy depends in part on tourism or heavily on international trade), but usually signatures of random people on the internet are not particularly compelling.

So, we encourage our supporters to consider these questions before giving over their personal information to sign an online petition:

  1. To whom is the petition addressed? Will that person or entity actually receive it? When?
  2. Does the petition ask the person or entity to do (or not do) something specific? Is that something within the power of the recipient to do?
  3. Will the person or entity to whom the petition is addressed be motivated to act by the signatures? In other words, does this person or entity have any reason to care about the opinions of the particular people signing the petition?

Whitehouse.gov petitions are special, in that President Obama has pledged to read and publicly respond to any petition that receives 100,000 or more signatures. Even there, though, a petition can be ineffective. One petition asked him to “outlaw factory farming.” Besides the vagueness of the term “factory farming,” there was the problem that the President does not have the authority do do any such thing! He has the power to direct the EPA to monitor and intervene in the methane emissions of confined animal feeding operations. He has the authority to direct the Justice Department to enforce any existing federal laws. But he has no unilateral power to outlaw any particular farming practice or to ban industrial animal agriculture as a whole.

The President does have the power to ask the Justice Department, or an independent commission, to investigate the actions of the American Egg Board in this case. Thus, while we would have preferred a more comprehensive and carefully worded petition, we do strongly encourage animal advocates to sign the one that has already begun to amass substantial signatures. Here’s the link, again. Let’s get it to 100,000 ASAP.

And let’s all use this incident as a reminder of two related things: (1) Liberating animals will require many more kinds of activism than simply promoting veganism; so (2) let’s honor and support the activists who do those other things, rather than insisting that everybody march in the same direction.

For more on that subject, here’s our cofounder pattrice jones, speaking at the “New Directions for Animal Advocacy” panel at AR2015 last month:

6 comments to What You Can Do to End the Conspiracy Against Vegan Mayo

  • James DeAlto
    Thanks, pattrice!

    I always love reading your blog, except when I leave comments, my autocorrect insists on your name being “pat trice.” I’m hoping others will join me in the fight against the spelling oppressors. I digress.

    You taught me something new about petitions and it’s nice to know that this one may actually have an impact. Sharing :)

    Hope you’re well!

  • Marcia Mueller
    One measure that the animal rights movement is taken seriously is the number of would-be laws and regulations that the exploiters are joining together in trying to either pass or block. Let’s hope our vegan mayo will be left alone!

    Thank you for the tips on petitions!

  • Nadja Lubiw-Hazard
    Thanks for the really useful information about online petitions, and the things to consider before investing in them.
    It will help me in the future making decisions about what to sign, and also how to get an effective petition started.
    I’m Canadian, so I don’t think my signature on this one counts, but I will forward it on!
  • Anita Chicquita
    Yet this collusion has been present in many forms for many, many years. Those of us who are parents probably fought the giant of the food industry, perhaps without even knowing it, by bucking up against the idea that milk is not an appropriate lunch drink. Think about that one: despite (what I consider) overwhelming evidence that milk is not desirable in kids’ tummies, the dairy industry has its tentacles into America so deeply that for a while in the 80s, cps would pay a visit to families who spoke out against it. This type ofcampaign is nothing new. Using social media and community action to attack the source IS.
  • Dallas Rising
    Hands down my favorite blog ever. Thanks for framing the drawbacks of online petitions in a succinct and simple, intelligent way.

    Love to everyone at VINE – it must be getting close to a gorgeous autumn out there.

  • Lleona Maury
    Why all the controversy over mayo. The original recipe did not contain eggs

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>